Whether we can accurately get the filling of bacterial germs (Sibo), if no symptoms are among those good examiners and those who explore bad, what is the point?
The stomach symptoms such as stomach pain and abdominal pain and blossoms of millions of doctors of the doctor every year. One of the conditions that may be thought to be “a senseless introduction” of the symptoms, the idea “has achieved the popularity of the Internet above some clinical circles and research.” Sibo is “widely defined as infections in small intestines” and is usually treated with antibiotics, but “dissolved to germs, and the abolition of our results, the elimination of our germs cannot save us C. DiffRedressing in a situation that may not be real.
Even different medicines agree that Sibo is overconfected, creating “confusion, and fear.” Sibo examination is “overly used and extremely dependent. The diagnosis is usually given immediately and without the limits. This cannot be very true and an example of luxury damage.” “‘The beast’ we see now Sibo may not be more than phantom.”
The traditional diagnostic way was a small intestinal ambulance, a long test when the throat when the throat goes to a sample and count bugs down there, as you can see at 2:10 in my video Are small tests of intestinal intestine (Sibo) valid?.
This method is almost completely replaced in respiratory tests. Usually, sugar called glucose has almost absorbed completely in small intestines, so they lower it on the colon. Therefore, the presence of the amount of such sugar shows that there are a smaller abdominal virus. Inflammation can be found because bacteria produces certain gases found in our blood before being released from our lungs, can be found electronically.
Earlier, the Lactilose’s lacteristical tests are not reliably detected bacteria, “so the small virus is finally imprinted.
Investigators have written sugar dose with a tracer and found that about half of the good results from Glucose its reading was false because there were just people. Therefore, “Sibo-written patients can be set as many as bacterial bacterial studies” in the form they have.
Why do experts continue to recommend respiratory examination? Could it be because “experts” were in a supportive conference by a wind company, and most received money from Sibo or antibiotic companies?
Even if we can get their own, does it matter? For those with milligating signs, there is a large range of the poisitivity from about 4 percent to 84 percent. The investigators “find that there is no difference in all things that are among those beautiful exams against those who tested the right ones with Sibo …” Therefore, a good result of a simple test. Who cares if other people have germs that grow in their small intestines if they do not match symbols?
Now, antibiotics can make people with symptoms of negative hearts found that Sibo feels better. Does that prove that Sibo was a cause? No, because antibiotics can only make many people feel better for the wrong with Sibo. Currently, Antibiotic Rifaximin is usually the most used for Sibo, but “is currently not allowed for the use of the indicator, and its expenses can be protected.” .
In addition, while antibiotics can help in a short time, they can make things worse in a long time. Those who are “given a course of anti-bacterial anti-germs as they may report several bowels after symptoms.” So, what can we do about these types of symbols? It’s exactly what I’m going to turn next.
